Updated November 26, 2024
Simon Dietz
Conversational systems, also known as chatbots, are increasingly used in various domains like e-commerce and customer service to enable direct communication between businesses and users [1][10]. These systems offer a natural language interface, making them accessible to non-technical users. While chatbot platforms are becoming more prevalent, building them remains a technically demanding task [1].
When delving into the world of chatbots, we encounter a vast array of technical terms [3]. While it’s not necessary to know every single term to grasp the fundamental concept of a chatbot [3], understanding key terms can significantly enhance your knowledge of conversational systems and artificial intelligence. As a non-technical user, a basic understanding is often sufficient. However, for my chatbot project, I aim to build a comprehensive vocabulary to achieve my learning goals.
In this document, I will compile a glossary of terms relevant to this topic that I come across during my research. Glossary
Key figures and their contributions:
The Turing Test
In 1950, Alan Turing introduced the Imitation Game, later known as the Turing Test, as a method to assess a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from that of a human [13]. While Turing was optimistic about the future of AI, he did not provide a specific timeline or success rate for this achievement.
“The original question, ‘Can machines think’ I believe to be too meaningless to deserve discussion. Nevertheless I believe that at the end of the [20th] century the use of words and general educated opinion will have altered so much that one will be able to speak of machines thinking without expecting to be contradicted [17].”
Despite significant advancements in AI, particularly in natural language processing and chatbot technology, the Turing Test remains a subject of debate and controversy. The test’s parameters and methodology are often interpreted differently, making it challenging to establish a definitive standard for machine intelligence [18].
It’s important to note that the Turing Test’s primary purpose is to provoke thought and discussion about the nature of intelligence, rather than to provide a definitive measure. As AI continues to evolve, we may need to explore alternative methods for evaluating machine intelligence, such as focusing on specific tasks or the ability to learn and adapt.
ELIZA
ELIZA, developed by Joseph Weizenbaum in the 1960s, was a groundbreaking computer program that simulated a Rogerian psychotherapist. It was one of the earliest examples of a chatbot, a computer program designed to simulate conversation with a human user.
How ELIZA worked:
PARRY
Kenneth Colby developed PARRY at Stanford University in 1968. This rule-based chatbot, similar to ELIZA, was designed to simulate a person with paranoia. PARRY could adapt its responses based on mood parameters like anger, fear, and mistrust, and even passed a modified Turing Test by fooling human evaluators [13].
Chatbots are far more sophisticated than simple question-answer systems. They often rely on a combination of models to create natural and helpful conversations. While chatbots can be complex, we can break down the core concept into a simplified representation to understand their basic functionality.
A typical chatbot involves:
This simplified model highlights the fundamental components of a chatbot, providing a solid foundation for further exploration.
classDiagram
class User
- Sends message
class Intent Recognition
- Receives message
- Recognizes intent
class Response Generation
- Receives intent
- Generates response
class User << (User) >>
class Intent Recognition << (System) >>
class Response Generation << (System) >>
User "Sends message" --> Intent Recognition
Intent Recognition "Recognizes intent" --> Response Generation
Response Generation "Generates response" --> User
Note: This is a simplified model. Real-world chatbots often involve more complex components and techniques, such as:
Chatbots can be classified based on their complexity, capabilities, and underlying technology [7]. Here are some common classifications:
A common way to categorize chatbots is based on their underlying technology an their level of autonomy. They are often divided into two main groups: rule-based chatbots and AI-powered chatbots. A combination of these technologies gives rise to a third category: hybrid chatbots.
Intent Recognition:
Response Generation:
Responses are often selected from a pre-defined set rather than generated entirely by the model. While models like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can generate highly sophisticated text, simpler rule-based or template-based approaches suffice for many applications.
Reinforcement Learning:
Key Considerations:
Training Data
A fundamental step in creating a chatbot is providing it with training data. This data consists of pairs of user utterances and their corresponding intents. By training a machine learning model on this data, the chatbot can learn to recognize user intents and provide appropriate responses.
Here’s a simple example of training data:
Text | Intent |
---|---|
Hi, how are you? | Greeting |
Hello, what can I do for you? | Greeting |
I need help | Help |
I have a problem | Help |
Can you help me with this? | Help |
What is the weather today? | Weather |
Tell me the weather forecast | Weather |
How a Chatbot Processes Training Data
Direct Match
When a chatbot is trained on a dataset like the one provided, it typically involves advanced machine learning techniques [12]. However, for simpler rule-based chatbots, a straightforward approach is to use predefined responses linked to specific user utterances or their variations. This method is particularly effective for chatbots with a large database of predefined responses. This concept is often referred to as exact match or direct match. Although this method demands a substantial, well-curated dataset, it provides a rapid solution for deploying a simple chatbot without the need for complex algorithms and infrastructure. In particular, FAQ agents can benefit greatly from this approach. If a company has a substantial dataset of real user queries and well-prepared support answers, building a rule-based chatbot becomes significantly easier. Direct matching is particularly effective for short, concise queries like “address,” “opening hours,” or a product name. By directly linking these keywords to specific responses, we can provide users with the desired information quickly and easily.
How does it work?
Note: While exact matching is a straightforward approach, it has limitations. It can struggle with variations in phrasing and may not handle complex queries effectively. More advanced chatbots often combine exact matching with techniques like natural language processing and machine learning to improve their capabilities.
Metadata
The direct match approach provides a solid foundation for building a simple chatbot. However, before you start storing a multitude of hashes in a database, consider enriching the simple utterance-intent pairs with metadata. For instance, you could capture the formality of the query (formal or informal). Additionally, combined intents should be considered. In the query “Hello, how are you? I need help finding a product,” for example, there are multiple intents. Here, the question arises as to which intent is more relevant to the user – probably the product search. A match counter could also be useful to track the frequency of certain queries.
Text | Intent | Metadata |
---|---|---|
Hi, how are you? | Greeting | Formal, Friendly |
Hello, what can I do for you? | Greeting | Formal, Helpful |
I need help | Help | Urgent, Problem-Oriented |
I have a problem | Help | Urgent, Problem-Oriented |
Can you help me with this? | Help | Urgent, Problem-Oriented |
What is the weather today? | Weather | Informational, Simple |
Tell me the weather forecast | Weather | Informational, Simple |
Why Metadata Matters
By adding metadata to your training data, you can provide your chatbot with more context and nuance. This can help it to:
Training Data 2
Data Quality: The quality of the training data is crucial. It should be clean, accurate, and relevant to the task. Data Augmentation: Techniques like backtranslation, synonym replacement, and text augmentation can be used to artificially increase the size and diversity of the dataset.
// TODO Explain how data is collected, cleaned, and formatted for chatbot training.
Entities are essentially labeled categories or types of information that are relevant within a user’s query. These can be concrete things like product names, locations, dates, or numbers, or more abstract concepts like colors or emotions.
During my initial research on chatbots, I encountered terminology similar to that used in behavior trees. Actions and conditions are fundamental components of a behavior tree. My first encounter with behavior trees was over 15 years ago, when they were not as widely used as they are today. Behavior trees are now a staple of major game engines and a well-established concept. I am curious about how I can apply this AI concept to a chatbot to assist it in performing actions. Specifically, I want to evaluate whether a combination of behavior trees and intent-based chatbots is feasible and what possibilities it offers.
// TODO how they work and their benefits in detail
Behavior trees are a powerful technique for structuring AI agents, including chatbots. They offer a hierarchical and modular approach to decision-making and action selection. By applying behavior trees to chatbot development, we can create more complex and intelligent conversational agents.
How Behavior Trees Can Enhance Chatbots
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyNaH27lX90 11-25-2024
Images